U.S. Supreme Court -- 31 U.S. 530 (1832)USA Application of laws to AboriginalsDoctrine of discovery
This American decision had been used by the Supreme Court of Canada since the very beginning of the development of Canadian Aboriginal law. It is one of the famous decisions rendered by the “Marshall court”.
Historically, Indians were considered as nations by Great Britain. A European nation acquired title to Indian lands only if the occupants decided to cede them.
Are Georgia’s laws in effect on Cherokee territory?
US Supreme Court – 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823)USA Aboriginal titleDoctrine of discoveryLands reserved for IndiansProperty
The decisions rendered by the “Marshall court”, including this one, marked the starting point for a judicial discussion about Aboriginals.
According to the doctrine of discovery, which binds the Aboriginals, the discoverer holds a title to the lands and an exclusive right to acquire Indian lands.
Does an Indian nation have the capacity to cede parcels of the land they occupied to private individuals?
Supreme Court of the United States – 30 U.S. 1 (1831)USA Application of laws to AboriginalsDoctrine of discoveryGovernance (self-determination, self-government)Jurisdiction over Indians
The Cherokee Nation is subject to the laws of the State of Georgia.
There is no doubt that the Cherokee Nation constitutes a distinct political society. However, the Cherokee Nation cannot be considered “foreign” for the purposes of the US Constitution. As such, it cannot go before the Supreme Court to prevent the State of Georgia from implementing its laws.